Understand & assess / Commitments versus evidence
See the gap between what you say and what your evidence shows.
Alive Assist compares commitments, requirements and available evidence so gaps can be prioritized and owned.
Last reviewed: October 2026
The problem
What makes this difficult today?
Commitments sit separately from operational proof.
Teams debate priorities without a shared view of exposure.
Remediation lists become too broad to execute.
The Alive approach
A clearer path from evidence to action
Compare promise and proof
Bring commitments and evidence into one register.
Example: a target is linked to its owner, baseline and latest proof.
Prioritize what matters
Separate material gaps from lower-risk improvements.
Example: missing governance evidence rises ahead of a formatting issue.
Assign the next move
Turn findings into actions with owners and timing.
Example: each priority has a clear accountable team.
How it works
Gather
Share commitments, policies and supporting evidence.
Compare
Review what is present, partial or missing.
Prioritize
Agree which gaps create the most risk.
Commitment
Evidence
Next action
Questions to consider